Our Critical Studies in Artificial Intelligence and Digitalisation (CSAID) research cluster is intended to provide a much-needed critical platform to interrogate, from a current as well as historical basis, the issues surrounding the introductions of AI and other digitalisation aspects that are both challenging and promising, today.
CSAID acts as a distinct grouping of research interests in AI researchers in the Management and Marketing group, EBS with impact and inclusion also outside our University. We will develop our work to lead in ways that are critical toward mainstream AI and digitalisation research.
CSAID members are interested in transformational human intervention into the processes assumed to be occurring as AI and digitalisation ‘advances’ across society.
CSAID members ask questions critically about the premise for AI and digitalisation research and innovation, where we see human/computer interaction progress, suggestions for ‘humans in the loop’ with algorithmic decision-making, and other social harms reduction suggestions in AI applications and tools, as flawed. This is in part because of mainstream rationalist approaches, which are often taken within corporate-led innovation and product development.
Reminiscent of Descartes and Leibniz, wherein the mind’s functioning relied on the formation of representations and symbols for different domains of activity (Dreyfus, 1972), this frame of reference abandons conceptualisations linked to sociality, social relations, the commons, and any way of thinking about integrating technologies that impact data subjects, whether consumers, workers, citizens, or otherwise, epistemologically.
Our work focuses on five research streams:
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being used to manage, augment, or otherwise transform work. AI and algorithmic data driven systems are expected to help firms improve productivity and profitability, but they may also impact the world of work significantly.
The Essex AI Policy Observatory for the World of Work (E-AIPOWW) is the first Observatory highlighting how AI regulation, development and governance are occurring across the world, and what this is beginning to mean, and will mean for the world of work, and workers’ experiences.
This is an ongoing project developing an AI-based software solution for emotion research to help researchers from various areas, from design to neurorehabilitation. The first component of our innovative solution, an improved approach for measuring emotional arousal through pupillary response, is now under review.
Researchers have long recognised pupil response as a potential objective indicator of emotional arousal; however, confounding factors, particularly luminosity of stimuli and the ambient environment, have limited its usefulness in detecting emotions. This study presents a new approach to isolate and remove the effect of luminosity on pupil dilation, obtaining the component of pupil dilation due only to emotional arousal.
Our model predicts the pupil size due to luminosity only as a function of the screen luminosity and adapts to individual differences in pupil response to light, different types and configurations of monitors by using a calibration procedure. We demonstrate that our model can be used simply to calculate emotional arousal. We showed 32 video clips with different content and emotional intensity to 47 participants, who, after each video, reported their level of emotional arousal. We then calculated the pupil size due only to luminosity and subtracted it from the total recorded pupil size, obtaining the component due only to emotional arousal. From the latter, we predicted the arousal of each participant for each video. Our results highlight that separating the emotional and luminosity components from pupillary responses is critical to accurately and precisely predicting arousal.
The project aimed to understand how community businesses are co-developing and making better use of data, community technology, and AI. Its primary goal was to identify key gaps in how data is collected and used, with a particular focus on how this could inform the design, development, and application of community technology and AI (CTAI) to support the transition to sustainable and equitable futures. The findings provide a foundation for collaboratively developing new frameworks for local data collection and exploring practical uses of CTAI.
This report presents research conducted collaboratively by researchers from the University of Essex and Promising Trouble, funded by the Business and Local Government Data Research Centre. Carried out between May and September 2024, the study examines how community businesses engage with technology and artificial intelligence (AI) and explores their views on 'community technology' and 'community AI' approaches.
The research involved 28 community businesses across the UK and 13 in-depth interviews with a diverse range of organisations. The findings reveal a broad spectrum of technological engagement, with a strong interest in community tech and AI for social good. However, organisations face significant challenges, including issues with data management, ethical adoption, limited resources, and a need for more education, collaboration, and community-led governance. The report calls for investment in skills, ethical governance, funding, and collaboration to ensure that community tech and AI are inclusive, sustainable, and driven by the needs of communities. Achieving the potential of community technology and AI to support more equitable and sustainable futures will require ongoing collaboration and investment, alongside a shift away from market-driven models towards those that are community-led, ethically grounded, and environmentally responsible.
We deeply appreciate everyone who contributed to this research, especially the participants whose knowledge and insights made it possible.
The Assemblage Brain unveils a major new concept of sense making, one that challenges conventional scientific and philosophical understandings of the brain.
Drawing on Deleuze and Guattari, the author calls for a radical critical theory that operates in the interferences between philosophy, science, art, and politics. From this novel perspective the book is structured around two questions: “What can be done to a brain?” and “What can a brain do?” Sampson examines the rise of neuroeconomics in informing significant developments in computer work, marketing, and the neuropharmaceutical control of inattentiveness in the classroom. Moving beyond the neurocapitalist framework, he then reestablishes a place for proto-subjectivity in which biological and cultural distinctions are reintegrated in an understanding of the brain as an assemblage.
The Assemblage Brain unravels the conventional image of thought that underpins many scientific and philosophical accounts of how sense is produced, providing a new view of our current time in which capitalism and the neurosciences endeavor to colonize the brain.
Tony has several related articles, chapters, and talks on this subject.
As the two leading countries in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, China and the United States largely rely on separate AI infrastructure and data annotation ecosystems. Studies have focussed almost exclusively on data annotation associated with American and European companies, limiting our understanding of how this contrasts with the Chinese development of AI.
This article provides a comparative analysis of the political economy of the Chinese and American/European AI data annotation ecosystems, focusing on the role of the state and the practice of outsourcing to data annotation institutions. It finds that while the US state plays a protectionist role concerning AI infrastructure such as semiconductors and data centres, it adopts a laissez-faire approach to data annotation. The Chinese state, however, understands it has a comparative advantage in data and invests heavily in its own data ecosystem while maintaining stringent regulations for Chinese tech companies. Secondly, many US companies outsource data annotation work to business process outsourcing centres and digital platforms, whereas Chinese companies maintain these activities in-house or, through a process of “inland-sourcing”, send this work to “third-tier” cities in Chinese provinces to data labelling bases, often jointly managed by local government and private companies.
Published in Big Data & Society May 2025
Loneliness has emerged as a pervasive social issue, significantly impacting individuals' emotional well-being and overall quality of life. This research aims to explore the social psychological mechanisms behind lonely consumers' preferences for service robots over human interactions. Specifically, it will investigate how emotional loneliness influences these preferences and identify the features of service robots that can enhance satisfaction and well-being for lonely individuals.
By examining the interplay between emotional loneliness and service robot attributes, this research seeks to provide valuable insights into how service robots can be optimised to meet the emotional needs of lonely individuals. The findings will contribute to the existing literature on loneliness, technology, and consumer behaviour, offering practical implications for service industries aiming to foster emotional connections and improve customer experiences.
Ultimately, this study aims to advance understanding of how technology can serve as a supportive tool in addressing the loneliness epidemic and enhancing emotional well-being.