Wed 22 Mar 23
It took seventy years before national emergency feeding plans were put to the test, and during the pandemic they were shown to have failed according to research at the University of Essex.
Sociologist Professor John Preston used archival data from once-secret Government files, now held by the National Archives and the Imperial War Museum to research the history of emergency plans. He found originally robust civil defence plans for emergency feeding in a national crisis were undermined by successive Governments and exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. His findings have been published in The British Journal of Sociology of Education.
Professor John Preston said: “The UK failed to adequately supply nutritional school meals to children, particularly working-class pupils, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a result of systematic neglect by a succession of Governments in planning for a national crisis, leading to the failure of the voucher scheme for meals, and the poor quality of provision, arising from decades of the undermining of expertise in the school meals service and underfunded provision in State schools.”
In the late 1940s and early 50s a post-war dividend with investment in school kitchens and staff meant that there were plans for the school meals service, to feed not just children, but to provide meals for the whole population in a national crisis. Well-resourced plans for ‘messing for the masses’ were devised where groups of one hundred people would sit down in shifts in schools to eat under a system of ‘crash feeding’.
During the 1950s and 1960s, the Ministry of Food and Emergency Planning Officers took control over emergency feeding plans, criticising the professionalism of school meals staff.
Professor Preston’s study reveals:
Professor Preston said: “The findings of the research have implications for other areas of long-term planning. We only find out about the failure of emergency plans in an actual emergency, so if Governments are effectively to plan for a crisis, then they need to ensure that their plans are up to date and robust."