Lockdown closures: schools’ improved provision led to increased time engagement from students and parents
Mon 19 Jul 21
How schools, parents and children coped with the biggest challenge in the history of modern education is at the centre of a ground-breaking research project, funded by the UKRI Economic and Social Research Council, analysing the reactions of schools and families to the school closures in 2020 and 2021.
As schools break up for the summer holiday, amid rising COVID infection rates and fears of further lockdowns next winter, the study by researchers at the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex highlights that efforts of schools and families combined to adapt to the challenges of education during school closures.
Most schools in the UK were closed to all but key workers and vulnerable children from March 2020 and again from January 2021, with each closure period lasting at least 8 weeks. School lessons were delivered online or offline to children in their homes and parents took a big role in supporting their children’s learning efforts. The research used data from families taking part in the COVID-19 Study of Understanding Society, the UK Household Longitudinal Study, to look at how parents and children engaged in home learning during the school closures, and analysed differences and similarities between the two periods of lockdown.
The study found that schools significantly improved their provision of online and offline lessons between the first and second period of school closures. In response to this, both primary and secondary school students increased their levels of engagement, and most parents helped more with schoolwork. These patterns were observed regardless of socio-economic background.
This study is the first comprehensive analysis comparing the two periods of school closures in the UK. It finds that schools improved their distance learning provision, with secondary schools offering three times more online lessons in the second closure period than in the first. It also finds that the number of online and offline lessons provided by schools did not significantly differ by school characteristics or the composition of the pupil intake. On top of this, online lessons seem to have reduced socio-economic inequalities in the time spent on schoolwork by primary school children and gender gaps in time spent on schoolwork by secondary school children.
While there are no significant socio-economic differentials in school provision of distance learning or parental help at home, the study acknowledges that some students could have fared worse than others during the period of home-schooling, This is possibly due to a lack of equipment, space, or family circumstances, as well as repeated bubble closures which might have hit the progress of children in more deprived areas of the country hard However, these inequalities were outside of the control of school leaders and teachers and remain so.
The key findings
Dr Birgitta Rabe, Reader at the University of Essex, leading the research said: “From a policy perspective, there are some important lessons from this study. Socio-economic differences in learning outcomes due to school closures may have relatively little to do with differences in learning provision by schools or the time parents spent home schooling.
If there are learning gaps from this period they may be much more closely related to structural differences across families, which affect factors such as the learning set-up parents can offer their children at home, parents’ ability to help children effectively with their school work and local COVID-19 infection rates, to name a few.
The offer of online and offline lessons provided by schools resulted in more engagement from students and from parents of primary school children in particular, in some cases leading to a reduction of socio-economic differentials.
Any future school closures should ensure a high number of education resources is provided by schools to all families and be accompanied by measures that mitigate the disadvantages arising from a home environment that makes effective home schooling more difficult for some families.”