The white paper published by the Joint Committee on Human Rights outlines the risk posed by the rapid growth of AI, particularly around discrimination, privacy, transparency and access to effective remedies.
It argues that existing UK laws and regulations are fragmented and leave gaps in protection, while responsibility can fall disproportionately on organisations using AI rather than the companies developing the systems.
The report relied heavily on research, citations and submissions from experts from the Human Rights Centre, including Professor Geoff Gilbert, Professor Lorna McGregor, Dr Giulia Gentile, Professor Audrey Guinchard and Dr Matthew Gillett.
The joint committee calls for a dedicated AI Bill and new AI regulator, alongside a risk-based approach that would prohibit the most harmful uses, require stronger safeguards and transparency, and ensure those best placed to prevent harm are held responsible.
The report references direct submissions from the Essex team, which stated “the regulation of this technology is one of the planetary challenges of this century”.
Researchers also state that a human rights approach to AI governance will help ensure “systems are for all, not for the few.”
Speaking after the publication of the report, Dr Gentile said: “We would never accept a society in which a human was permitted to spy on you, stalk you, secretly curate your access to information, and influence courts and institutions charged with safeguarding your rights.
“The biggest threat posed by AI on our human rights is that we currently permit it to engage in all of these activities.
“What we need is a regulatory overhaul that at least installs safeguards against these perils.”
Professor Gilbert added: “What is sad is that it should not need another Parliamentary report to remind us that human rights apply at all times and in all circumstances to protect all people and that it regulates the use of AI like any other technology.”
You can read the joint committee's report via this webpage
