The aim of the Essex Accounting Centre (EAC) research seminar series is to support our world-class research activities in five key areas: accounting and global development; capital Markets, audit, regulation & reporting; publicness and resilience, precarity, exclusion & social justice; and environment, climate change & vulnerability. The seminar series is also expected to promote inter-disciplinary research that links the work of members of the centre with others both within the university and with external institutions.
This study aims to describe and empirically evidence the evolution of "public interest" and "public good” notions in corporate reporting regulation within the context of the European Commission between 2000 and 2024.
Using the theoretical perspectives of public interest in Box (2007), it aims to link them with the evidenced shifts in the use of those notions to argue and discuss on the potential unintended consequences. Using a text analysis tool, our findings confirm a three-step evolution of the terms of PG and PI from efficiency in the capital market, to promoting financial stability, to achieving a more sustainable world.
We argue that the EU reporting standard-setting process can be explained through the ideology theory of regulation, with a public interest notion that has shifted from an aggregative to a process perspective. We argue that the broader notion and the use of corporate reporting to get political goals, either economic, social or environmental, results in a complex scenario in which the potential number and typology of unintended effects are difficult to predict and where empirical research plays a crucial role.