GV952-7-FY-CO:
Comparative European Politics

The details
2020/21
Government
Colchester Campus
Full Year
Postgraduate: Level 7
Current
Thursday 08 October 2020
Friday 02 July 2021
30
05 June 2020

 

Requisites for this module
(none)
(none)
(none)
(none)

 

(none)

Key module for

MA L24012 Global and Comparative Politics,
MA L240EB Global and Comparative Politics,
MA L240EK Global and Comparative Politics,
MSC L24012 Global and Comparative Politics,
MSC L240EB Global and Comparative Politics,
MSC L240EK Global and Comparative Politics

Module description

The objective of this module is to provide a better understanding of democratic political and economic processes in Europe.

The first part of the module will be devoted to studying the roots of party systems, party competition, electoral systems, the rise of populist and extremist parties, democratic backsliding, and linkages between citizens and politicians in West and East European countries.

In the second part, we will study the institutional foundations of welfare-capitalism and examine how coordinated and liberal capitalism types responded to challenges such as globalisation and deindustrialization. A large part of the module is devoted to studying the power-sharing arrangements in the European Union. In this context, we will explore what the euro crisis, disintegration dynamics, and trade disputes might mean for the future of the EU. The module also provides an accessible introduction to research design and methods that political scientists have used to address these topics

Module aims

By the end of the course students will have a sound knowledge of contemporary European politics, and understand the advantages and limitations of comparative research. Specifically, participants will become familiar with important academic debates in political party behaviour, the rise of extremism, democratic backsliding, European Union politics, welfare-capitalism foundations, and economic policymaking in Europe.

Students are encouraged to critically assess the validity of conflicting theoretical claims and arguments on the basis of appropriate empirical evidence. The module will also help students hone their analytical and writing skills. By composing short response papers, a grant application, an essay, and peer review comments, students learn how to tailor their writing to different audiences.

Module learning outcomes

• Thinking, discussing, and writing clearly and logically.
• Linking together, and understanding the linkages between, empirical facts and abstract concepts.
• Retrieving, synthesising, and critically evaluating information from diverse sources.
• Writing effectively for different audiences.
• Revising written work based on (sometimes conflicting) feedback.

Module information

The module will cover the following topics:

Week 2: Methods and Concepts of Comparative Research
Week 3: Social Cleavages and Party Systems
Week 4: Dynamics of Party Competition

Module Description

The objective of this module is to provide a better understanding of democratic political and economic processes in Europe. The first part of the module will be devoted to studying the roots of party systems, party competition, electoral systems, the rise of populist and extremist parties, democratic backsliding, and linkages between citizens and politicians in West and East European countries. In the second part, we will study the institutional foundations of welfare-capitalism and examine how coordinated and liberal capitalism types responded to challenges such as globalisation and deindustrialization. A large part of the module is devoted to studying the power-sharing arrangements in the European Union. In this context, we will explore what the euro crisis, disintegration dynamics, and trade disputes might mean for the future of the EU. The module also provides an accessible introduction to research design and methods that political scientists have used to address these topics.

Module Aims

By the end of the course students will have a sound knowledge of contemporary European politics, and understand the advantages and limitations of comparative research. Specifically, participants will become familiar with important academic debates in political party behaviour, the rise of extremism, democratic backsliding, European Union politics, welfare-capitalism foundations, and economic policymaking in Europe. Students are encouraged to critically assess the validity of conflicting theoretical claims and arguments on the basis of appropriate empirical evidence. The module will also help students hone their analytical and writing skills. By composing short response papers, a grant application, an essay, and peer review comments, students learn how to tailor their writing to different audiences.

Module Outcomes

* Thinking, discussing, and writing clearly and logically.
* Linking together, and understanding the linkages between, empirical facts and abstract concepts.
* Retrieving, synthesising, and critically evaluating information from diverse sources.
* Writing effectively for different audiences.
* Revising written work based on (sometimes conflicting) feedback.

Module Structure and Teaching

1 hour lecture and 1 hour class

What we expect of you during lecture and classes:
* To attend all lectures and classes after having done the required reading.
* To pay attention and take notes as necessary.
* To think about the readings before class, and be ready to discuss them: try to identify the key assumptions in the texts; map the structure of the argument; underline the conclusions. Highlight to yourself points you don't understand. If you don't understand it, it is likely that others have not understood it either, so don't be shy to ask. Ask yourself whether you agree with the text, whether you can identify weaknesses or gaps in the argument, and what could someone who disagrees with it argue against it.
* To offer your participation. You are expected to answer questions, raise new points, and contribute to the progression of discussion in class. Learning about and discussing these texts is a communal endeavour and it is a matter of good citizenship to contribute.

Module Topics

Week 2: Methods and Concepts of Comparative Research
Week 3: Social Cleavages and Party Systems
Week 4: Dynamics of Party Competition
Week 5: Populist Parties and Linkages between Voters and Citizens
Week 6: Economic Crises and the Rise of Radical Right Parties
Week 7: Electoral Systems
Week 8: Sources of Polarization and Depolarization
Week 9: Social Capital
Week 10: Democratic backsliding
Week 11: Unitary States, Federal States, Devolution, and Bicameralism

Christmas vacation

Week 16: Direct Democracy and Referendums
Week 17: Interest Groups
Week 18: Varieties of Capitalism and Skill Regimes
Week 19: The Welfare State and Welfare State Retrenchment
Week 20: Central Banks
Week 21: The European Union – politics and crisis management
Week 22: EU Trade Policy
Week 23: Disintegration Dynamics in the EU
Week 24: Patronage and Corruption
Week 25: European responses to COVID-19

Learning and teaching methods

1 hour lecture and 1 hour class

Bibliography

  • SETALA, MAIJA. (2006-06) 'On the problems of responsibility and accountability in referendums', in European Journal of Political Research. vol. 45 (4) , pp.699-721
  • McCoy, Jennifer; Somer, Murat. (2019-01) 'Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies', in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. vol. 681 (1) , pp.234-271
  • Beland, Daniel. (2005-02) 'Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective', in Social Policy and Administration. vol. 39 (1) , pp.1-18
  • Borchardt, Knut. (1991) Perspectives on modern German economic history and policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kitschelt, Herbert. (1988-01) 'Organization and Strategy of Belgian and West German Ecology Parties: A New Dynamic of Party Politics in Western Europe?', in Comparative Politics. vol. 20 (2) , pp.127-
  • Estevez-Abe, Margarita. (2006) 'Gendering the Varieties of Capitalism. A Study of Occupational Segregation by Sex in Advanced Industrial Societies', in Gendering the Varieties of Capitalism. A Study of Occupational Segregation by Sex in Advanced Industrial Societies. vol. 59 (1) , pp.142-176200659
  • Munck, Gerardo L.Snyder, Richard. (2007) 'Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals', in Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals. vol. 40 (2007) , pp.5-31200740
  • Walter, StefanieDinas, EliasJurado, IgnacioKonstantinidis, Nikitas. (2018) Noncooperation by Popular Vote: Expectations, Foreign Intervention, and the Vote in the 2015 Greek Bailout Referendum.
  • J. Lawrence Broz. (1998) 'The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem', in International Organization: The MIT Press. vol. 52 (2) , pp.231-268
  • Moffitt, Benjamin. (2015-04) 'How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism', in Government and Opposition. vol. 50 (2) , pp.189-217
  • Meunier, Sophie; Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. (2006-09) 'The European Union as a conflicted trade power', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 13 (6) , pp.906-925
  • Hall, Peter A.; Soskice, David W. (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Thorlakson, Lori. (2003-04) 'Comparing federal institutions: Power and representation in six federations', in West European Politics. vol. 26 (2) , pp.1-22
  • Gesthuizen, Maurice; van der Meer, Tom; Scheepers, Peer. (2009-06) 'Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam's Thesis in European Countries', in Scandinavian Political Studies. vol. 32 (2) , pp.121-142
  • Hooghe, Liesbet; Marks, Gary. (2018-01-02) 'Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 25 (1) , pp.109-135
  • John M. CareySimon Hix. (2011) 'The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low-Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems', in The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low-Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems. vol. 55 (2) , pp.383-397
  • Bogdanor, Vernon. (2005-06-15) 'CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN BRITAIN: The Quiet Revolution', in Annual Review of Political Science. vol. 8 (1) , pp.73-98
  • Heller, William B. (2007-06) 'Divided Politics: Bicameralism, Parties, and Policy in Democratic Legislatures', in Annual Review of Political Science. vol. 10 (1) , pp.245-269
  • Green, Jane; Jennings, Will. (2012-04) 'Valence as Macro-Competence: An Analysis of Mood in Party Competence Evaluations in Great Britain', in British Journal of Political Science. vol. 42 (2) , pp.311-343
  • CUSACK, THOMAS R.; IVERSEN, TORBEN; SOSKICE, DAVID. (2007-08) 'Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems', in American Political Science Review. vol. 101 (3) , pp.373-391
  • Nathalie GigerHeike Klüver. (2016) 'Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation', in Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation. vol. 60 (1) , pp.190-205
  • Berman, Sheri. (1996) 'Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic', in Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. vol. 49 (3) , pp.401-429199649
  • Adriaensen, JohanGonzález-Garibay, Montserrat. (2013) The Illusion of Choice: The European Union and the Trade-Labor Linkage.. vol. 9 (Issue 4, p542-559) , pp.542-559
  • Takis S. Pappas. (2009) 'Patrons Against Partisans', in Party Politics. vol. 15 (3) , pp.315-334
  • Kitschelt, Herbert. (2000) 'Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities', in Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. vol. 33 (2000) , pp.845-879200033
  • Caramani, Daniele. (2017) Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.
  • McKay, Amy. (2012-12) 'Buying Policy? The Effects of Lobbyists’ Resources on Their Policy Success', in Political Research Quarterly. vol. 65 (4) , pp.908-923
  • (no date) '`Bowling alone': Frame II.', in `Bowling alone': Frame II.. vol. 20 (Issue 2, p119, 2p) , pp.1-
  • Jones, ErikKelemen, R. DanielMeunier, Sophie. (1010) 'Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration', in Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. vol. 49 (2016) , pp.1010-1034201649
  • de Vreese, Claes H. (2006-09) 'Political Parties in Dire Straits?', in Party Politics. vol. 12 (5) , pp.581-598
  • Bustikova, Lenka. (1738) 'Revenge of the Radical Right', in Revenge of the Radical Right. vol. 47 (2014) , pp.1738-1765201447
  • Lipset, Seymour Martin; Rokkan, Stein. (1967) Party systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives, New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Häusermann, Silja. (2006-02) 'Changing coalitions in social policy reforms: the politics of new social needs and demands', in Journal of European Social Policy. vol. 16 (1) , pp.5-21
  • GIGER, NATHALIE; NELSON, MOIRA. (2011-01) 'The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?', in European Journal of Political Research. vol. 50 (1) , pp.1-23
  • Blauberger, Michael; Kelemen, R. Daniel. (2017-03-09) 'Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 24 (3) , pp.321-336
  • Genschel, Philipp; Jachtenfuchs, Markus. (2018-01) 'From Market Integration to Core State Powers: The Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory', in JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. vol. 56 (1) , pp.178-196
  • Jackson, GregoryDeeg, Richard. (2006) How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity.
  • Gravey, Viviane; Jordan, Andrew. (2016-09-13) 'Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 23 (8) , pp.1180-1198
  • Thelen, Kathleen; Busemeyer, Marius R. (2011-11-01) 'Institutional Change in German Vocational Training: From Collectivism toward Segmentalism', in The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation: Oxford University Press., pp.68-100
  • Sunstein, Cass R. (2002-06) 'The Law of Group Polarization', in Journal of Political Philosophy. vol. 10 (2) , pp.175-195
  • Waldner, David; Lust, Ellen. (2018-05-11) 'Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding', in Annual Review of Political Science. vol. 21 (1) , pp.93-113
  • Bonnie M. Meguid. (2005) 'Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success', in Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. vol. 99 (3) , pp.347-359
  • Schmitter, Philippe C; Karl, Terry Lynn. (1991) 'What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not', in Journal of Democracy. vol. 2 (3) , pp.75-88
  • Przeworski, Adam; Teune, Henry. (1982, c1970) The logic of comparative social inquiry, Malabar, Fla: R.E. Krieger.
  • Rydgren, Jens. (2007-08) 'The Sociology of the Radical Right', in Annual Review of Sociology. vol. 33 (1) , pp.241-262
  • Alejandro Portes. (2000) 'The Two Meanings of Social Capital', in The Two Meanings of Social Capital. vol. 15 (1) , pp.1-12
  • Anthony Downs. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy', in An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. vol. 65 (2) , pp.135-150
  • Klüver, Heike. (2013-01) 'Lobbying as a collective enterprise: winners and losers of policy formulation in the European Union', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 20 (1) , pp.59-76
  • Peter A. Hall. (1994) 'Central Bank Independence and Coordinated Wage Bargaining: Their Interaction in Germany and Europe', in German Politics & Society: Berghahn Books. (31) , pp.1-23
  • Mihály Fazekas; Jana Chvalkovska; Jiri Skuhrovec; István János Tóth; Lawrence Peter King. (2013) Are EU funds a corruption risk? The impact of EU funds on grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Corruption Research Centre Budapest., pp.2-36
  • Louis W. Pauly. (1995) 'Capital Mobility, State Autonomy and Political Legitimacy', in Journal of International Affairs: Journal of International Affairs Editorial Board. vol. 48 (2) , pp.369-388
  • Valentino Larcinese; Indraneel Sircar. (2017) 'Crime and punishment the British way: Accountability channels following the MPs’ expenses scandal', in European Journal of Political Economy. vol. 47, pp.75-99
  • Pablo Fernández-Vázquez; Pablo Barberá; Gonzalo Rivero. (2016) 'Rooting Out Corruption or Rooting for Corruption? The Heterogeneous Electoral Consequences of Scandals', in Political Science Research and Methods. vol. 4 (2) , pp.379-397
  • G. Bingham Powell, Jr.Georg S. Vanberg. (2000) 'Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy', in Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy. vol. 30 (3) , pp.383-411
  • Baccini, Leonardo; Dür, Andreas. (2012-01) 'The New Regionalism and Policy Interdependence', in British Journal of Political Science. vol. 42 (1) , pp.57-79
  • Niemann, Arne; Zaun, Natascha. (2018-01) 'EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives', in JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. vol. 56 (1) , pp.3-22
  • Jones, Erik. (2018-03-04) 'Towards a theory of disintegration', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 25 (3) , pp.440-451
  • Bryan Caplan. (2007) Introduction to The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies.
  • Marco AlifanoGiuseppe AttanasiFabio IannelliFaredj CherikhAntonio Iannelli. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic: a European perspective on health economic policies.
  • Cas Mudde. (2004) 'The Populist Zeitgeist', in The Populist Zeitgeist. vol. 39 (4) , pp.541-563
  • Harteveld, Eelco; Schaper, Joep; De Lange, Sarah L.; Van Der Brug, Wouter. (2018-01) 'Blaming Brussels? The Impact of (News about) the Refugee Crisis on Attitudes towards the EU and National Politics', in JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. vol. 56 (1) , pp.157-177
  • Schleiter, Petra; Tavits, Margit. (2016-07) 'The Electoral Benefits of Opportunistic Election Timing', in The Journal of Politics. vol. 78 (3) , pp.836-850
  • Hobolt, Sara Binzer. (2006-01) 'Direct democracy and European integration', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 13 (1) , pp.153-166
  • John Gerring. (2004) 'What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?', in What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?. vol. 98 (2) , pp.341-354
  • Peter Mair. (2007) 'Political Opposition and the European Union', in Political Opposition and the European Union. vol. 42 (1) , pp.1-17
  • Gherghina, Sergiu. (2017-06-07) 'Direct democracy and subjective regime legitimacy in Europe', in Democratization. vol. 24 (4) , pp.613-631
  • Gerring, John. (2007) 'Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?', in Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?. vol. 40 (2007) , pp.231-253200740
  • Ross, Fiona. (2000-04) '‘Beyond Left and Right’: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare', in Governance. vol. 13 (2) , pp.155-183
  • McGann, Anthony J.; Kitschelt, Herbert. (2005-03) 'The Radical Right in The Alps', in Party Politics. vol. 11 (2) , pp.147-171
  • Hennessy, Alexandra. (2013-09) 'Informal Governance and the Eurozone Crisis', in Journal of Contemporary European Studies. vol. 21 (3) , pp.429-446
  • Larry Diamond. (2008) 'The Democratic Rollback: The Resurgence of the Predatory State', in The Democratic Rollback: The Resurgence of the Predatory State. vol. 87 (2) , pp.36-48
  • Fabbrini, Sergio. (2003-06) 'Bringing Robert A Dahl’s Theory of Democracy to Europe', in Annual Review of Political Science. vol. 6 (1) , pp.119-137
  • Kelemen, R. Daniel. (2017-04) 'Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union', in Government and Opposition. vol. 52 (2) , pp.211-238
  • Bonotti, Matteo; White, Jonathan; Leman Ypi, Lea; Calder, Gideon; Donovan, Mark; Roberts, Peri; Vincent, Andrew; Williams, Howard. (2018-11) 'In Defence of Political Parties: A Symposium on Jonathan White and Lea Ypi’s', in Political Studies Review. vol. 16 (4) , pp.289-305
  • Meissner, Katharina L.; McKenzie, Lachlan. (2019-09-02) 'The paradox of human rights conditionality in EU trade policy: when strategic interests drive policy outcomes', in Journal of European Public Policy. vol. 26 (9) , pp.1273-1291
  • Feldstein, Martin. (2012) The Failure of the Euro: The Little Currency That Couldn't. vol. 91 (1) , pp.105-1162012

The above list is indicative of the essential reading for the course. The library makes provision for all reading list items, with digital provision where possible, and these resources are shared between students. Further reading can be obtained from this module's reading list.

Assessment items, weightings and deadlines

Coursework / exam Description Deadline Coursework weighting
Coursework   Short Response Paper 1     10% 
Coursework   Short Response Paper 2     10% 
Coursework   Grant Proposal    30% 
Coursework   Short Response Paper 3    10% 
Coursework   Short Response Paper 4    10% 
Coursework   Essay and Peer Review    30% 

Additional coursework information

Assessment: This module is assessed by 100% coursework Instant Deadline Checker Assignment Title Due Date Coursework Weighting* Feedback Due Short response paper 1 Week 4 10% Week 7 Short response paper 2 Week 7 10% Week 10 Grant proposal Week 11 30% Week 15 Short response paper 3 Week 17 10% Week 20 Short response paper 4 Week 19 10% Week 22 Essay and peer review Week 25 30% Week 29 Assessment Marks for this module will be determined as follows: Short response papers (10% each) The writing prompts will be distributed in the first week of term. Approximately 450-550 words length each, due in weeks 4, 7, 17, and 19. Grant proposal (30%) You will write a grant proposal that is related to Comparative European Politics, on a topic of your choosing. You will have to explain why your research question is important and merits funding, and reflect on the skills you bring to a research project. You will not actually submit your application, but the purpose is to practice grant writing so that you can submit a persuasive application to the British Academy, ESRC, or other grant-making agency in the future. Approximately 1,500-2,000 words length, due in week 11. Essay and peer review (30%) Regarding the essay, you may: (a) write an analytic narrative (theory-based explanation of an event or events); or (b) offer a new theory or modify an existing one, using history, game theory, statistical analysis, or contemporary events as motivation or illustration; or (c) compare and contrast existing theories using cases; or (d) evaluate an existing theory using two or more cases. Although this list is not exhaustive, you must not write a literature review, an information dump, or a purely narrative account. You are required to submit an essay draft in week 22 to peer review. Every student will review the papers submitted by two of their class mates, and receive two sets of comments. You aren’t asked to rank or judge your peers, but provide formative feedback on the argument, research design, evidence, methodology, and paper structure, to help your colleagues improve as researchers and writers. Please note: the draft and peer review are required and part of your essay mark, but there is no need to upload them to FASER. Early in the term, I will let you know who will be reviewing whose work. Peer review comments: approximately 350-450 words length, due in week 23. Once you have received comments, please revise your paper based on the criticism and write a memo to the reviewers, explaining how you modified your paper. If you get conflicting advice, be sure to spell out why you chose to follow some suggestions but not others. Essay (final version): approximately 3,000-3,500 words length, due in week 25. Memo to reviewers: approximately 350-450 words length, due in week 25 (the memo should be the last page of your essay, and will not count towards the 3,000-3,500 word limit). Study Abroad Assessment – ZA variant Study abroad students will write two short response papers, and one grant proposal (or essay, depending on whether they attend in the autumn or spring).

Exam format definitions

  • Remote, open book: Your exam will take place remotely via an online learning platform. You may refer to any physical or electronic materials during the exam.
  • In-person, open book: Your exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may refer to any physical materials such as paper study notes or a textbook during the exam. Electronic devices may not be used in the exam.
  • In-person, open book (restricted): The exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may refer only to specific physical materials such as a named textbook during the exam. Permitted materials will be specified by your department. Electronic devices may not be used in the exam.
  • In-person, closed book: The exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may not refer to any physical materials or electronic devices during the exam. There may be times when a paper dictionary, for example, may be permitted in an otherwise closed book exam. Any exceptions will be specified by your department.

Your department will provide further guidance before your exams.

Overall assessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%

Reassessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%
Module supervisor and teaching staff
Dr Alexandra Hennessy, email: alexandra.hennessy@essex.ac.uk.
Dr Alexandra Hennessy
Module Supervisor Dr Alexandra Hennessy alexandra.hennessy@essex.ac.uk Module Administrator Jamie Seakens govpgquery@essex.ac.uk

 

Availability
Yes
No
No

External examiner

Dr Nicholas Walter Vivyan
University of Durham
Senior Lecturer
Dr Damien Bol
King's College London
Senior Lecturer
Resources
Available via Moodle
Of 1503 hours, 0 (0%) hours available to students:
1503 hours not recorded due to service coverage or fault;
0 hours not recorded due to opt-out by lecturer(s).

 

Further information
Government

Disclaimer: The University makes every effort to ensure that this information on its Module Directory is accurate and up-to-date. Exceptionally it can be necessary to make changes, for example to programmes, modules, facilities or fees. Examples of such reasons might include a change of law or regulatory requirements, industrial action, lack of demand, departure of key personnel, change in government policy, or withdrawal/reduction of funding. Changes to modules may for example consist of variations to the content and method of delivery or assessment of modules and other services, to discontinue modules and other services and to merge or combine modules. The University will endeavour to keep such changes to a minimum, and will also keep students informed appropriately by updating our programme specifications and module directory.

The full Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the University governing how it operates are set out in the Charter, Statutes and Ordinances and in the University Regulations, Policy and Procedures.