this issue:  contents (on this page) newsresearch (on this page)peopleartswhat's on
wyvern

June 2002

  
wyvern
home page

feedback / contact

University of Essex

 

Research

Essex academic in heated debate about 'hate crime laws'

An Essex sociology academic recently took part in a heated panel discussion to review the arguments for and against so called 'hate crime laws' to mark the publication of a new book on the subject.

Dr Paul IganskiThe Hate Debate, a book published by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR), and edited by Dr Paul Iganski of the Department of Sociology was at the centre of the debate. It was Dr Iganski who also introduced the discussion that was held at the JPR in London during mid-April.

Every year thousands of crimes are committed involving some kind of bigotry against the victim, it is these crimes that have been labelled 'hate crimes' by courts in the United States. In the US laws have also been introduced that enable harsher punishment of hate crime offenders compared with offenders in parallel crimes who are motivated by other reasons.

Britain does have its own variety of hate crime laws. The 1998 Crime and Disorder Act calls for stricter punishment for racially aggravated offences. These 'hate crime' provisions were extended just a few months ago under the 2001 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act, to cover religiously aggravated offences.

Opponents to such hate crime laws in the US argue that offenders are given extra punishment for their bad values, and they are therefore essentially punished for 'thought crimes.' According to one contributor to The Hate Debate, Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby, 'one of the worst defects of hate crime laws is that they punish not just deeds, but opinions….This amounts to an assault on freedom of speech and belief.'

However, there has been very little debate in Britain. This panel discussion gave opponents and supporters of hate crime laws a much-needed opportunity to discuss the moral aspects of the laws and how they might be advantageous or destructive if introduced more extensively in Britain.

According to Dr Iganski, 'it is important to engage with such arguments because the right to freedom of expression, and the thought behind expression, is a cherished right in Britain….[and] although this might not be a popular opinion to express, perpetrators of crimes have rights too, and arguably a measure of our civilisation is the degree to which criminals are treated justly.'

The debate was chaired by JPR Director Professor Barry Kosmin with contributions by, among others, the leading human rights lawyer Geoffrey Bindman, Peter Fahy, Deputy Chief Constable of Surrey Police, and Gary Younge, columnist for The Guardian.

The JPR is an independent think-tank that informs and influences policy, opinion and decision-making on social, political and cultural issues affecting Jewish life. Dr Iganski was appointed a Civil Society Fellow of the JPR in 1999 where he now carries out research on racism, anti-Semitism, civil rights and the law, within their civil society programme.

ESRC funds study into young offenders

Professor Richard Hammersley, of the Department of Health and Human Sciences (DHHS), was recently awarded a grant worth nearly £190,000 to study the links between substance abuse and youth crime.

The award, granted by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), will fund one of five different projects looking at the varying concepts of 'risk' and being 'at risk' for young offenders. The network is being directed by academics at the University of Sheffield while studies are also being carried out at the Universities of Newcastle, De Montfort and Nottingham.

The Essex project, entitled 'The identification of risk and protective factors, and levels of substance misuse among young offenders,' will involve 500 young people, aged between 14 and 17, from 10 Youth Offending Teams across England and Wales who will complete questionnaires under the guidance of researchers. The questionnaires will relate to three main areas: substance misuse; offending; and risk and protective factors. Additional questions will explore the young persons' expectations of themselves by the age of 25.

The groups of youngsters taking part will include those with substantial misuse problems and those with no or only experimental experience of substance abuse.

It is hoped that the study will enable researchers to examine patterns of substance use amongst young offenders and identify relationships between substance misuse, offending, and personal and social risk factors. Another of the main aims is to identify possible factors and influences that help young offenders resist and desist drug misuse.

The study is expected to be complete in September 2005.

Also in the printed June edition of Wyvern:

  • New University research @ Adastral Park
  • Business Managers appointed
this issue: contents (on this page) newsresearch (on this page)peopleartswhat's on