Books and Reports
·
Ames, Rolando Amex and Felix Reátegui, ‘Toward Systemic Social
Transformation: Truth Commissions and Development’, in
Transitional Justice and
Development: Making Connections, ed. by Pablo de Greiff and
Roger Duthie (New York: Social Science Research Council, 2009), pp.
142-169
·
Barsalou, Judy and Victoria Baxter,
‘The
Urge to Remember: The Role of Memorials in Social Reconstruction and
Transitional Justice’, in
Stabilization and Reconstruction Series, 5 (2007)
·
Bickford, Louis, ‘Memoryscapes’ in
The Art of Truth-Telling after
Authoritarian Rule, ed. by Ksenija Bilbija and others (Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press, 2005)
·
Cassel, Douglas,
‘The
Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ in
Victims Unsilenced: The Inter-American Human Rights System and
Transitional Justice in Latin America (Washington: Due Process
of Law Foundation, 2007), pp. 151-166.
·
Cruvellier, Thierry, From the Taylor Trial to a Lasting Legacy:
Putting the Special Court Model to the Test (New York:
International Center for Transitional Justice and Sierra Leone Court
Monitoring Programme, 2009)
·
Dexter, Tracy and Philippe Ntahombaye,
The Role of Informal Justice
Systems in Fostering the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Situations:
The Case of Burundi (Geneva and New York: Human Dialogue
Report, 2005)
·
Drumbl, Mark A., Atrocity, Punishment and International Law
(New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
·
Freeman, Michael, Truth
Commissions and Procedural Fairness (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2006)
·
Hall, Cristopher, ‘New Uses for an Old Tool’ in
Justice for Crimes against
Humanity, ed. by Mark
Lattimer and Philippe Sands
(London: Hart, 2003), pp. 47-71
·
Hayner, Priscilla.
Negotiating Peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the Justice Challenge
(Geneva and New York:
Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue and the International Center for
Transitional Justice, 2007)
·
Kritz, Neil, ‘Where
We Are and How We Got Here: An Overview of Developments in the
Search for Justice and Reconciliation’ in The
Legacy of Abuse ed. by
Alice H. Henkin
(New York: the Aspen Institute, 2002)
·
Mallinder, Louis, Amnesty,
Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and
Justice Divide (Oxford: Hart, 2008)
·
Moon, Claire, Narrating
Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation
Commission (US: Lexington Books, 2009)
·
Naidu, Ereshnee, The Ties That
Bind: Strengthening the Links Between Memorialisation and
Transitional Justice (Centre for the Study of Violence and
Reconciliation, 2006) <http://www.csvr.org.za/docs/livingmemory/tiesthatbind.pdf>
·
Nalepa, Monika, Skeletons in
the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (New
York: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
·
Nino, Carlos Santiago. ‘Punishment
as a Response to Human Rights Violation: A Global Perspective’, in
Radical Evil on Trial (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), pp. 3-41
·
Peskin, Victor, International
Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle
for State Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2008)
·
Posel, Dborah and Graeme Simpson, “The
Power of Truth: South Africa’s TRC in Context” in
Commissioning the Past: Understanding South Africa’s Truth and
Reconciliation Commission.
(Johannesburg,
Witwatersrand University Press, 2002)
·
Post-conflict justice,
ed. by Mahmoud Cherif Bassiouni (New York: Transnational
Publishers, 2002)
·
Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against
Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making,
ed. by Carla Ferstman, Mariana Goetz and Alan Stephens (The
Netherlands: Brill, 2009)
·
Sandoval, Clara, Ruth Rubio-Marin and Catalina Diaz, “Repairing
Family Members: Gross Human Rights Violations and Communities of
Harm” in The Gender of
Reparations, ed. by Ruth Rubio-Marin (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2009), pp. 215-290.
·
Sandoval, Clara, The Concepts of ‘Injured Party’ and ‘Victim’ of
Gross Human Rights Violations in the Jurisprudence of the
Inter-American Court of Human Rights: A Commentary on their
Implications for Reparations" in
Reparations for Victims of
Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes: Systems in Place
and Systems in the Making, ed. by Carla Ferstman, A Stephens,
and
Mariana Goetz and Alan
Stephens (The Netherlands: Brill, 2009)
·
Scharf, Michael P. and Nigel Rodley, “International Law Principles
on Accountability” in Post-Conflict Justice, International and
Comparative Criminal Law Series,
ed. by M Cheriff Bassiouni (Ardsley: Transnational
Publishers, 2001), pp. 89-96.
·
Shelton, Diane, Remedies in
International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2005)
·
Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth
versus Justice,
ed. by
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, and Javier Mariezcurrena (New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2006)
·
Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Did the TRC deliver?,
ed. by
Audrey R. Chapman and Hugo Van der Merwe (US, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008)
Articles
·
Akhavan, Payam, ‘Are International Criminal Tribunals a Disincentive
to Peace?: Reconciling Judicial Romanticism with Political Realism’,
Human Rights Quarterly, 31.3
(2009), 624-654
·
Bickford, Louis, ‘Unofficial
Truth Projects’,
Human Rights
Quarterly, 29.4 (2007), 994–1035
·
Dickinson, Laura, ‘The Promise of Hybrid Courts’,
American Journal of
International Law, 97
(2003), 295-310
·
Evans, Rebecca, ‘Pinochet in London – Pinochet in Chile:
International and Domestic Politics in Human Rights Policy’,
Human Rights Quarterly,
28.1 (2006), 207-244.
·
Magarrell, Lisa,
‘Reparations in Theory and Practice’,
Reparative Justice Series,
(2007)
·
Magarell, Lisa and Suliman Baldo, ‘Reparations and the Darfur Peace
Process: Ensuring Victims' Rights’,
Reparative Justice Series, (2007) <http://www.ictj.org/images/content/8/8/886.pdf>
·
Mendez, Juan E.,
‘Accountability for Past Abuses’,
Human Rights Quarterly,
19.2 (1997), 255-282
·
Nalepa, Monika, ‘Punish All Perpetrators or Protect the Innocent?
Comparing Systems of Transitional Justice’,
Journal of Theoretical
Politics, 20.2 (2008), 221-245
·
O’Keefe, Roger, ‘Universal Jurisdiction: Clarifying the Basic
Concept’, Journal of
International Criminal Justice, 2.3 (2004), 735-760
·
Oko, Okechukwu, ‘The Challenges of International Criminal
Prosecutions in Africa’,
Fordham International Law Journal, 31.2
(2007 – 2008), 343-414
·
Orentlicher, Diane F., ‘Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute
Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime’,
Yale Law Journal, 100.8
(1991), 2537-2615
·
Orentlicher, Diane F., ‘Whose Justice?
Reconciling Universal Jurisdiction with Democratic
Principles’, Geo. L.J., 92.6 (2003), 1057-1134
·
Rodman, Keneth A., ‘Is Peace in the Interests of Justice? The Case
for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal
Court?’ Leiden Journal of
International Law, 22
(2009), 99-126
·
Sandoval, Clara,
‘The
Challenge of Impunity in Peru: The Significance of the
Inter-American Court of Human Rights’,
Essex Human Rights Review,
5.1 (2008), 1-18
·
Stromseth, Jane, ‘Justice on the Ground: Can International Criminal
Courts Strengthen Domestic Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies?’,
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1 (2009), p. 87-97
·
Waldorf, Lars, ‘Mass Justice for Mass Atrocities: Rethinking Local
Justice as Transitional Justice’,
Temple Law Review, 79.1
(2006), 1-87
·
Wilson, Richard. ‘The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the
Age of Human Rights (review)’,
Human Rights Quarterly, 28.2
(2006), 528-542
Conference Papers and Presentations
·
ICTJ Prosecutions Program, in Conference on Building a Future on
Peace and Justice
"Pursuing
Justice in Ongoing Conflict: A discussion of Current Practice",
June 25-27, 2007, Nuremberg.
International Organisations Documents and Legal Instruments
·
African Union. High Level Panel on Darfur.
Report of the African Union on Darfur, The Quest for Peace, Justice
and Reconciliation.
Adis Ababa: African Union, 2009.
·
European Union. Council of the European Union.
EU Comprehensive Approach to the European Union Implementation of UN
Security Council Resolutions 1325 & 1820 on Women, Peace & Security.
Brussels: European
Union, 2008.
·
European Union. Council of European Union.
The AU-EU Expert Report on the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction.
Brussels: European Union, 2009.
·
Inter American System of Human Rights. Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights,
Principal Guidelines for a Comprehensive Reparations Policy,
OEA/Serv/L/V/II.131.Doc1, Washington: Inter-American
Commission, 19 February 2008.
·
Inter American System of Human Rights. Inter American Commission of
Human Rights. Report 28/92, Hugo Leonardo
de los Santos et. al. v. Uruguay,
Washington: Inter-American Commission, 2 October 1992.
·
Inter American System of Human Rights. Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights,
Statement by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on the
Applications and Scope of the Justice and Peace Law in Colombia,
Washington: Inter-American Commission, 8 January 2006.
·
International Meeting on Women’s and Girls’ Right to a Remedy and
Reparation.
Nairobi Declaration on Women's and Girls' Right to a Remedy and
Reparation. Signed 19-21 March 2007.
·
OECD.
The Paris
Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for Action,
2005 & 2008.
·
United Nations. Diane Orentlicher, Commission on Human Rights.
Impunity: Report of the
Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat
Impunity. E/CN.4/2005/102.
Geneva: Economic and Social Council, 18 February 2005.
·
United Nations. Diane Orentlicher, Commission on Human Rights.
Impunity: Report of the
Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat
Impunity: Addendum.
E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1. Geneva: Economic and Social Council, 8 February 2005.
·
United Nations. General Assembly,
Basic
Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation
for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law
and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.
Resolution A/RES/60/147,16. New York: United Nations, December 2005.
·
United Nations. Mr.
Joinet, Commission on Human Rights.
Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Human Rights Violations
(Civil and Political). E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20. Economic and Social Council, 2 October 1997.
·
United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights,
Right to the Truth:
Human Rights Resolution 2005/66, E/CN.4/RES/2005/66.
Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 20 April
2005.
·
United Nations. Security Council.
The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and
Post-Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary General,
S/2004/616.
New York: United Nations, 23 August 2004.