|
Extract from the University's Role and
Responsibilities policy document. (available
in full here)
N.B. “Award External” is used where the responsibilities are only those of the
Award External Examiner
“Module External “is used where the responsibilities are only those of the
Module External
Where responsibilities are those of both Award and Module external examiners,
the term “External Examiner” is used.
Introduction
1. The University of Essex has two types
of External Examiners, whose roles may be summarised as follows:
(a) Award External Examiners.
Award External Examiners have overarching responsibility for the standards of
the awards to which they are assigned. They are required to attend Boards
of Examiners for those awards. Award External Examiners will also be Module
External Examiners for the modules in the awards to which they are assigned, but
not for any modules to which a separate Module External Examiner is assigned.
(b) Module External Examiners.
Module External Examiners have responsibility for ensuring the standard of any
particular modules to which they are assigned, and will be appointed for their
specialist subject knowledge. They do not attend Boards of Examiners
unless they are also Award External Examiners.
2. The responsibility for approval of the
appointment of External Examiners lies with the Dean of the appropriate Faculty
or of Academic Partnerships.
3. The External Examiner System is governed by
Ordinance 45 of the University of Essex
4. The names and home institutions of external
examiners will be published to students in online course information and
handbooks.
Principles governing the role of the Award External Examiners and Module
External Examiners
1) Every taught award of the University shall have an
Award External Examiner.
2) All modules that contribute to an award must be
allocated to an External Examiner. Responsibility for individual modules
must not be allocated to more than one External, but an Award External may have
overarching responsibility for this module as part of an award.
3) Any one award should not have more than one Award
External Examiner. In the case of Joint or Multi-disciplinary awards one Award
External should be appointed from the lead department and at least one Module
External should be appointed from the other department(s). Exceptions to
these principles may be made in special circumstances with the approval of the
Dean, in discussion with the PVC (Academic Standards).
4) An Award External is appointed to a degree course (or
group of cognate degree courses) and any associated sub-degree awards and shall
also be responsible for a reasonable proportion of the modules which comprise
that award.
5) Where appropriate (e.g. Joint or Multi-disciplinary
awards), the department will arrange for liaison between the Award External
Examiner and the External(s) responsible for the relevant modules that they have
not had responsibility for, in order that the Award External Examiner may be
assured that there are no areas of concern which might affect the overall
quality and standard of the award. For awards where this is not possible (e.g.
Areas awards) the external will have the right to see a sample of work for the
purposes of duties A1 and A2 (below) only.
6) External examiners shall normally be appointed for a
period of up to four years by the relevant Dean, under powers delegated by the
Council, receiving nominations from the departments or partner institutions
concerned. Exceptionally, an extension of one year may be granted to
ensure continuity. Appointments may be terminated with two months' notice
by either party except in the case of breach of contract, or where a conflict of
interest comes to light, when a contract may be terminated immediately following
completion of the termination procedures. External examiners for taught
awards may not be re-appointed for another taught award by the University within
five years.
7) Factors affecting the number and range of External
Examiner appointments in a department include:
· Workload - quantity of assessed
material being examined;
· Academic diversity of the provision;
· Capacity of individuals to make
competent judgements against external reference points, eg Framework for Higher
Education Qualifications;
· Professional, regulatory and
statutory body requirements;
· Joint and multidisciplinary courses;
· Diversity of assessments, electronic
delivery, performances/presentations, work-based learning.
|
|