|
The
Electromagnetics and Health research team are always working on scientific
papers for peer-review. Peer-review is an important part of the research
process - it means that scientists can open their research to the scrutiny
of other experts in the field, before making it public. Most journals will
select two or three independent experts in the field that the work covers,
who then assess the scientific method, factual accuracy, results and
conclusions. This process ensures that scientists are using the appropriate
techniques and points interested parties to work that is credible.
Below are abstracts from
our peer-reviewed published articles on base station research and links to
the full papers that can be downloaded for free.
Do TETRA (Airwave) Base Station Signals Have a Short-Term Impact on Health
and Well-Being? A Randomized Double-Blind Provocation Study
Denise Wallace, Stacy Eltiti, Anna Ridgewell, Kelly Garner, Riccardo Russo,
Francisco Sepulveda, Stuart Walker, Terence Quinlan, Sandra Dudley, Sithu
Maung, Roger Deeble, Elaine Fox
Background: 'Airwave' is the new communication system currently being rolled
out across the UK for the police and emergency services. Some police
officers have complained about skin rashes, nausea, headaches and depression
as a consequence of using their Airwave handsets. In addition, a small
sub-group in the population self-report being sensitive to electromagnetic
fields (EMFs) in general.
Objectives: A randomized double-blind provocation study was conducted to
establish whether short-term exposure to a Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA)
base station signal has an impact on health and well-being in individuals
with self-reported 'electrosensitivity' and controls.
Methods: 51 individuals with self-reported 'electrosensitivity' and 132 age-
and gender-matched controls participated in an open provocation test, while
48 sensitive and 132 control participants went on to complete double-blind
tests in a fully screened semi-anechoic chamber. Heart rate, skin
conductance and blood pressure readings provided objective indices of
short-term physiological response. Visual analogue scales and symptom scales
provided subjective indices of well-being.
Results: No differences occurred on any measure between TETRA and Sham (no
signal) under double-blind conditions for either control or electrosensitive
participants and neither group could detect the presence of a TETRA signal
above chance (50%). When conditions were not double-blinded, however, the
self-reported electrosensitive individuals did report feeling worse and
experienced more severe symptoms during TETRA compared to Sham.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the adverse symptoms experienced by
electrosensitive individuals are due to the belief of harm from TETRA base
stations rather than due to the low-level EMF exposure itself.
Download full paper here.
Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone
Base Station Signals Does Not Affect Cognitive Functioning or Physiological
Measures in Individuals who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields and
Controls.
Stacy Eltiti, Denise Wallace, Anna
Ridgewell, Konstantina Zougkou, Riccardo Russo, Francisco Sepulveda, and
Elaine Fox.
Individuals who report
sensitivity to electromagnetic fields often report cognitive impairments
that they believe are due to exposure to mobile phone technology. Previous
research in this area has revealed mixed results, however, with the majority
of research only testing control individuals. Two studies using control and
self-reported sensitive participants found inconsistent effects of mobile
phone base stations on cognitive functioning. The aim of the present study
was to clarify whether short-term (50 min) exposure at 10 mW/m(2) to typical
Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) and Universal Mobile
Telecommunications System (UMTS) base station signals affects attention,
memory, and physiological endpoints in sensitive and control participants.
Data from 44 sensitive and 44 matched-control participants who performed the
digit symbol substitution task (DSST), digit span task (DS), and a mental
arithmetic task (MA), while being exposed to GSM, UMTS, and sham signals
under double-blind conditions were analyzed. Overall, cognitive functioning
was not affected by short-term exposure to either GSM or UMTS signals in the
current study. Nor did exposure affect the physiological measurements of
blood volume pulse (BVP), heart rate (HR), and skin conductance (SC) that
were taken while participants performed the cognitive tasks.
Download
full paper here.
Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone
Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals who Report Sensitivity
to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomised Provocation Study.
Stacy Eltiti, Denise Wallace, Anna Ridgewell, Konstantina Zougkou, Riccardo
Russo, Francisco Sepulveda, Dariush Mirshekar-Syahkal, Paul Rasor, Roger
Deeble, Elaine Fox
Background:
Individuals with Idiopathic Environmental Illness with attribution to
electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) believe they suffer negative health effects
when exposed to electromagnetic fields from everyday objects, such as mobile
phone base stations.
Objectives: This study utilized both open provocation and double-blind
tests to determine if sensitive and control individuals experience more
negative health effects when exposed to base station-like signals compared
to sham.
Methods: 56 self-reported sensitive and 120 control participants were
tested in an open provocation test. Of these, 12 sensitive and 6 controls
withdrew after the first session. The remainder completed a series of
double-blind tests. Subjective measures of well-being and symptoms, as well
as physiological measures of blood volume pulse, heart rate and skin
conductance were obtained.
Results: During the open provocation, sensitive individuals reported
lower levels of well-being in both the Global System for Mobile
Communication (GSM) and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS)
compared to sham exposure, while controls reported more symptoms during the
UMTS exposure. During double blind tests the GSM signal did not have any
effect on either group. Sensitive participants did report elevated levels of
arousal during the UMTS condition, while number or severity of symptoms
experienced did not increase. Physiological measures did not differ across
the three exposure conditions for either group.
Conclusions: Short-term exposure to a typical GSM base station-like
signal did not affect well-being or physiological functions in sensitive or
control individuals. Sensitive individuals reported elevated levels of
arousal when exposed to a UMTS signal. Further analysis, however, indicated
that this difference was likely to be due to the effect of order of exposure
rather than the exposure itself. Environmental Health Perspectives
doi:10.1289/ehp.10286, 2007.
Download full paper here.
Download commentaries submitted and our response to them here.
Development and Evaluation of the
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Questionnaire.
Stacy Eltiti, Denise Wallace, Konstantina
Zougkou, Riccardo Russo, Stephen Joseph, Paul Rasor and Elaine Fox
Electromagnetic
hypersensitivity (EHS) syndrome is usually defined as a condition where an
individual experiences adverse health effects that he or she believes is due
to exposure to objects that emit electromagnetic fields. The aim of this
study was to develop a questionnaire that would identify the key symptoms
associated with EHS and determine how often these symptoms occur in the
general population of the United Kingdom. In the pilot study, an EHS
questionnaire was developed and tested. In Study 1 the EHS questionnaire was
revised and sent to a randomly selected sample of 20,000 people. Principle
components analysis of the symptoms resulted in eight subscales:
neurovegetative, skin, auditory, headache, cardiorespiratory, cold related,
locomotor, and allergy related symptoms. Study 2 established the validity of
the questionnaire in that EHS individuals showed a higher severity of
symptoms on all subscales compared to the control group. The two key results
of the study were the development of a scale that provides an index of the
type and intensity of symptoms commonly experienced by people believing
themselves to be EHS and a screening tool that researchers can use to
pre-select the most sensitive individuals to take part in their research.
Bioelectromagnetics 28: 137-151, 2007.
Download full paper here.
Health Effects of Mobile Phone Base-Stations: Studies of Electromagnetic
Hypersensitivity.
Elaine Fox, Stacy Eltiti, Denise Wallace, and
Riccardo Russo
This paper outlines some of the key factors
required to investigate the health effects of mobile phone base-stations in
human volunteers. Issues involved in the investigation of “Electromagnetic
Hypersensitivity Syndrome” (EHS) are discussed. A brief review is provided
of the current scientific literature on the effects of mobile phone
technology on health in those reporting EHS. Future research needs are
identified and discussed. Proceedings of Base Station and Wireless
Networks Workshop: 59, 2007.
Download the proceedings here. |