--- in empirical work, stress convincing and significant findings of fact. Careful establishment of an interesting or puzzling empirical regularity is of value to the field even if the author may not have a convincing explanation for the phenomenon.
--- in theoretical work, stress relatively robust ideas, and combine theory with a sense of empirical magnitudes. Even back-of-the-envelope calculations can help us relate the theory to empirically important phenomena.
--- organise and analyse a body of facts about a firm, an industry, or a business practice according to economic principles. Such a case study must go well beyond the purely descriptive by illuminating the ways in which industry practice and institutions can be understood in terms of economic principles. Factors that resist economic explanation also should be identified.
We think that high-quality work along these lines exists (and could be produced), but does not necessarily conform to the current standard of academic industrial organisation methodology and too often draws comments such as "Very interesting, but where can you publish it?" We are keen enough on this style of work that we hope to make it a mainstay of the JIE. We believe this initiative will fill a need that has not been satisfied by the existing journals. We hope you agree with us.
The Editors of The Journal of Industrial Economics
| Pierre Régibeau (General Editor) | Yeon-Koo Che |
| Kenneth Corts | Thomas Hubbard |
| Patrick Legros | Frank Verboven |
Editorial Mission
Published first in 1952, the Journal has a very wide international
circulation, and has established itself as a leading journal in the field
of industrial economics. It was founded to promote the analysis of modern
industry, particularly the behaviour of firms and the functioning of markets.
Contributions are welcomed in all areas of industrial economics including:
organisation of industry, applied oligopoly theory, product differentiation
and technical change; theory of the firm and internal organisation; regulation,
monopoly, merger and technology policy.
The Journal has a tradition of publishing a blend of theory and
evidence. Theoretical papers are welcomed and should be presented so as
to highlight their implications for policy and/or empirical analysis. Likewise,
empirical papers should have a sound theoretical base; and where novel
econometric techniques are applied these should be clearly explained. Case
studies should be motivated by, and inform, economic theory and should
avoid pure description.
The Editors are ready to publish shorter notes which report significant
new data or empirical results, or are short comments on subjects which
have featured in previous issues of the Journal. Books are not reviewed,
but substantial review articles will be considered for publication.