You are in: Home :: News Story |
NEWS STORY
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Prime Minister
disregard of human rights obligations shocks Amnesty
International
|  |
 |
|
 |
By Amnesty
International, 18 February 2000.
In an ironic coincidence, the United Nations Secretary General's
praise for Australia's
assistance to East Timor today contrasts with the Australian Prime
Minister's refusal to accept that universal human rights standards
equally apply to his own country, Amnesty International said.
If all states which signed
up to human rights treaties took the same view as Prime Minister
John Howard, then we might as well tear them up," Amnesty
International said.
The Prime Minister's blunt
rejection of Australia's accountability to the rest of the world
over its human rights record is a flagrant violation of the
principle that state parties to human rights treaties are
accountable to each other," the organization added.
Prime Minister Howard's
repeated dismissal of Australian violations of international
standards reveals a shocking disregard of his country's obligations.
His government has persistently refused to act on laws and practices
which UN bodies found inconsistent with Australia's human rights
obligations.
The recent death of a
15-year-old Aboriginal boy serving a mandatory detention term
highlights the punitive and racist effects of juvenile justice laws.
The legislation prevents a court from considering restitution to
victims and the harm created when sentencing property offenders.
An average of 75 per cent of
children detained in Australia's Northern Territory are Aboriginal,
although they make up only about 32 per cent of the juvenile
population. A government member of Parliament has asserted that the
laws target "Aboriginal lawlessness".
It is not up to the Prime
Minister to decide when the universal human rights standards that
were applied recently in East Timor should be applied to his own
country. If Australia voluntarily binds itself to international
treaties, it must accept being held accountable to them," the
organization concluded.
Background Australia
rejected criticism of its juvenile justice laws by the UN Committee
on the Rights of the Child in 1997, of its mandatory detention of
asylum seekers by the UN Human Rights Committee in 1997, and of its
racially discriminatory Aboriginal land use laws by the UN Committee
on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in 1999.
|