|
|||||||||
|
News Stories
December 29 2000 afrol.com, 29 December - Amid ongoing
discussions between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone on
the setting up of a tribunal to prosecute war crimes in that country, the UN
Security Council has suggested that the court prosecute only the top leaders
who played main roles in the commission of crimes, according to a document
released yesterday in New York. The recommendation came in a letter dated 22
December from the Security Council to Secretary-General Kofi Annan, and
follows the Council's review of a report from Mr. Annan on the establishment
of the Special Court, according to UN sources. In August this year, the Security Council had
asked Secretary-General Kofi Annan to negotiate an agreement with the Sierra
Leonean Government to create an independent special court, consistent with a
UN resolution, adopted unanimously. The special court was to try Sierra
Leonean war criminals and "have personal jurisdiction over persons who
bore the greatest responsibility for the commission of crimes referred to in
the resolution." That would include those leaders who, in committing
such crimes, had threatened the establishment and the implementation of the
peace process in Sierra Leone. Yesterday, the Council members again were recommending that
the Court should have personal jurisdiction only over "persons who bear
the greatest responsibility" for the crimes, and said juvenile
offenders would instead go before the proposed Truth and Reconciliation
Commission. To this end, they encouraged the Government of Sierra Leone and
the UN to develop suitable institutions, including specific provisions
related to children. According to estimates from the UN Children's
Fund (UNICEF), some 5,000 children, mostly boys, were used as combatants
during Sierra Leone's nine-year civil war, during which mutilations of
civilians were a common tactic by the RUF terrorists. The Security Council members rejected the
Secretary-General's recommendation that the new Court be financed through
mandatory fees levied on all UN members, as is the case for the war crimes
tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. They recommended instead
that the Court rely on voluntary funding. Turning to the subject of allegations towards
peacekeepers, the members of the Security Council said they believed it was
the responsibility of troop-contributing countries to investigate and
prosecute any crimes their soldiers may have committed in Sierra Leone.
"Given the circumstances of the situation in Sierra Leone, the Special
Court would have jurisdiction over those crimes only if the Security Council
considers that the Member State is not discharging that
responsibility," the letter stated. The members of the Security Council also
disagreed with the report's proposal of setting up two Trial Chambers,
recommending a single Trial Chamber instead, "with the possibility of
adding a second Chamber should the developing caseload warrant its
creation." There has earlier been widespread protests
against the limitations of the UN special court. The renowned US human
rights NGO Human Rights Watch has criticized the Court's jurisdiction would
be only to war crimes committed since November 30, 1996. "The Court
must be vested with powers to vigorously enforce international cooperation
at every stage, and member States should cooperate with the Court's orders
and requests," the human rights group said in November. Also the limitation to only try "the most responsible" has been seen as a possibility of undermining the court's work. This combined with "voluntary funding" might limit the court significantly and leave most of the work to the still not established Truth and Reconciliation Commission (probably to be financed by Sierra Leone itself).
|
|
|||||||
|
(c) 1999- The Children and Armed Conflict Unit |
|||||||||